signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)
commit e21294a7aaae32c5d7154b187113a04db5852e37 upstream.
Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Backlund <tmb@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a098c13..ac7b51b 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
* SIGSEGV.
*/
if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
- force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
+ force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
out_unmark:
current->fs->in_exec = 0;