clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h b/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
index e880054..110f453 100644
--- a/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
*/
struct tk_read_base {
struct clocksource *clock;
- cycle_t (*read)(struct clocksource *cs);
- cycle_t mask;
- cycle_t cycle_last;
+ u64 (*read)(struct clocksource *cs);
+ u64 mask;
+ u64 cycle_last;
u32 mult;
u32 shift;
u64 xtime_nsec;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct timekeeper {
struct timespec64 raw_time;
/* The following members are for timekeeping internal use */
- cycle_t cycle_interval;
+ u64 cycle_interval;
u64 xtime_interval;
s64 xtime_remainder;
u32 raw_interval;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ extern void update_vsyscall_tz(void);
extern void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *ts, struct timespec *wtm,
struct clocksource *c, u32 mult,
- cycle_t cycle_last);
+ u64 cycle_last);
extern void update_vsyscall_tz(void);
#else